I listened to last week's Costing the Earth with mounting frustration as it failed to live up to its normal high standards. The podcast is here.
The show came from a foodie event in Green Bristol. It was billed as a debate, but with five talkative experts, too many questions, and only 30 minutes, the result was just points of view sailing past each other. Just as interesting statements were made and challenged, we had to move on, and there was no exploration of the issue. Every question could have taken up the whole show. What was the point? And who on Earth thought this a good idea?
Respond