Daly, Meadows and the SDGs

Posted in: Comment, News and Updates

So, how do the SDGs map onto the Daly & Meadows model?  Here's a first approximation ...

Wellbeing – is the Ultimate End – happiness, fulfillment & enlightenment – to be achieved through ethics

Goals: – ?3: Good Health and Well-Being  

Human and Social Capital – are the Intermediate Ends – health & wealth, knowledge, leisure & mobility, consumer goods – to be achieved through the political economy

Goals: 1: No Poverty   2: Zero Hunger   ?3: Good Health and Well-Being   4: Quality Education   5: Gender Equality   10: Reduced Inequalities    11: Sustainable Cities and Communities     12: Responsible Consumption and Production   16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions     17: Partnerships for the Goals

Built and Human Capital – are the Intermediate Means – Manufacturing & infrastructure work, tools & materials – to be achieved through science & technology

Goals: 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth    9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure

Natural Capital – provides the Ultimate Means – solar energy, natural cycles and systems, biological resources & minerals

Goals: 6: Clean Water and Sanitation    7: Affordable and Clean Energy   13: Climate (change)   14: Life Below Water    15: Life on Land

In a way these layers resemble the Stockholm wedding cake, but with the goals distributed differently.  The cake was:

Partnership Goal                     17

Economic Goals                8  9  10  12

Social Goals                 1  2  3  4  5  7  11  16

Biosphere Goals               6  13  14  15

 

But Daly / Meadows is (in this view):

Wellbeing Goals                                                                    ?3

Human and Social Capital Goals                1  2  ?3  4  5  10  11  12   16  17

Built and Human Capital Goals                                        8  9

Natural Capital Goals                                                6  7   13  14  15

The way I have constructed this illustrates how unbalanced the goals are with their strong focus on enhancing human and social justice, and their relative neglect (in Daly / Meadows terms) of the point of life.  It's as though the authors of the goals focus on making things a bit less worse in material terms for a lot of people – and that's it.

Of course, there are a lot of people whose lives need to be less worse than they are now, so that is understandable as a priority.  But that's not everything ...

Posted in: Comment, News and Updates

Respond

  • (we won't publish this)

Write a response