Archive for May, 2008

Nearly six weeks ago Alison kicked off the Web Sessions with her talk on managing your professional identity. Alison’s presentation discussed the opportunities and pitfalls of an online identity and contained information useful to every web user. With this audience in mind our next talk will take a look at one of the ways you can make the web work for you – using news feeds to bring fresh content to you rather than you going out looking for it.

Join us, Wednesday 4th June at 12:15 in 1WN 3.23, for The Other Side of the Web – RSS and Atom Feeds – a swift ride through the world of feeds: what they are, how to spot them, and what you can do with them when you’ve found them.

Further to my previous post about the CASE seminar held on Tuesday…

Following Helen’s enlightening talk about re-branding the University of Southampton (and implications for the web), my former colleague Roy Bayfield from Edge Hill University took to the stage to talk about how the web sits at the centre of marketing at Edge Hill.

Having worked with Roy for many years I was fully aware that he, as Director of Corporate Marketing, was switched on to the web as a key marketing tool. He’s twittered, blogged and (social) networked for some time and has been keen to embrace new technologies to enhance marketing/communications.

Roy demonstrated the award-winning Hi – Applicant Site and explained how the site helped to guide applications through the applications process and brought them into the ‘University’ community; allowing them to meet new friends, chat with current students and form a picture of the life that awaited them.

As a public site Roy highlighted some of the concerns surrounding opening up informal University communication channels and some of the benefits and opportunities this opened up.

Next we had a presentation from Pamela Michael from Imperial College London. Pamela explained the reasons why Imperial completely re-designed their website last year and talked us through their research-led approach to the whole process. As one of the top Universities in the world, Imperial have a vast audience to engage with and the re-design was initiated following a review of their (old) site which highlighted the fact that key research and strengths were not being effectively showcased via the web. What I found most interesting from Pamela’s talk was the approach. Imperial engaged and communicated with the college at every stage and the changes were measured and effective and very in-keeping the strong brand.

Finally we had a presentation from Emma Leech, Head of Marketing and Communications at Manchester Metropolitan University. I’d previously heard Emma described as the “head of a very new media savvy team” so I was interested in her talk focussing on extending marketing using third party site and services.

Emma showcased some very interesting examples of how MMU have utilised third party services such as Facebook and YouTube to maximise their web presence. She discussed the importance of having a switched on new media team to keep their eye on new developments and seek out new marketing opportunities.

Overall the feedback from the event was very positive. I certainly felt (and others have also commented) that the event brought together a community waiting to form. The web is fundamental to marketing/communications. It no longer sits outside traditional marketing. Communicating isn’t simply “… and also put it up on the web”. A strategic approach is required to maximise exposure, engage users and to provide an experience which compliments and strengthens the brand of a University.

Many thanks to all the speakers who did a sterling job on the day. I am inspired!

Earlier in the year I was approached by CASE and asked to put together a programme and deliver a seminar which would help CASE members make the most of the web. For the unfamiliar CASE is the Council for the Advancement and Support of Education it is “the professional organization for advancement professionals at all levels who work in alumni relations, communications, fundraising, marketing and other areas”. I was asked to put together a programme which would give members from the more traditional marketing/communications backgrounds an insight into how HEI’s are using the web at the forefront of marketing/communications initiatives.

That I did.

On Tuesday (2oth May) we held said seminar in London to an audience full of colleagues from Higher Education in a variety of marketing and communications roles. The seminar entitled The Web : a Powerful Recruitment and Communication Tool featured presentations from both traditional and modern Universities and looked at differing approaches and strategies to strengthen online communications.

I started the day by delivering a presentation entitled “A Question of Confidence” (slides below) which focussed on the current climate, our audiences and explored the potential for utilising web technologies to push information out and extend the reach of communications.

Next up we had an interesting presentation from Adrian Porter of Precedent Communications.

Adrian reported on the findings from recent reports into how modern and traditional Universities used the web. Looking at four areas; objectives, technology, communicating and basics, Precedent compared how Universities measured against each other. Without wanting to give too much away (the report is only due to be published in June)… the results were very interesting and not how I expected!

Following Adrian we had a much anticipated presentation from Helen Aspell who is the Head of Digital Marketing at the University of Southampton. I was particularly interested to hear what Helen had to say as Southampton have recently re-branded and re-launched their website which has prompted a lot of debate. The website particularly has attracted a lot of discussion in web circles with Brian Kelly recently asking the question “Is Southampton Setting A New Standard For Institutional Web Sites?

So I eagerly awaited Helen’s talk and I wasn’t disappointed.

Helen spoke about the reasons why the University felt a re-brand was necessary, something I found particularly interesting given its position and status. As I feel many people still assume re-branding or investment in marketing is only required to fix a problem it was interesting and encouraging to hear how Southampton used a re-brand to strengthen their position. With regards to the web I found some of the approaches used really obvious (once Helen had mentioned them)! Social bookmarking the entire site, using stories in the media to highlight research from the University are key examples of maximising what you have and things which I and others will certainly take away and explore.

Overall I was really impressed with Southampton not just with the website (which I find visually appealing and easy to use) but with the way the University LIVE their brand. It’s incredibly important to know who you are as an Institution and to provide an experience which reflects that… and it’s great to see this being carried across to the web.

Lots of food for thought!

In my next post I’ll feed back on presentations from Roy Bayfield, my former colleague at Edge Hill University, Pamela Michael from Imperial College London and Emma Leech from Manchester Metropolitan University.

We have been asked to provide some data to support a competition at this year’s IWMW. As a result we’ve carried out some work to make the University’s search results available in a variety of formats. A form available on our website demonstrates the formats that are available.

We also decided to get together a list of the places where we made data available that could be reused or re-purposed by anyone who is interested. In most of our services we now consider RSS or Atom as a minimum:

Some examples of microformats that can be found around our site:

Hopefully people will find some interesting ways of using this data and we might see some opportunities to build on this in the future.

On 30 April, I gave a presentation to maintainers of academic websites, outlining the plan to move all websites into the content management system, and explaining the import process and how we will work with maintainers to get their sites into the CMS. You can watch the video or view the presentation.

There were lots of questions.

Q. But my department site already has a CMS.
A. We can take the generated HTML and import that into the CMS.

Q. Can I still use Dreamweaver?
A. Once your site is in the CMS, no. Why not try OpenCMS and see how you get on? You will still be able to edit the source-code of the pages. We will also have nifty new features for you to use, like RSS feeds. And you can encourage other members of your department to edit content, while you concentrate on information architecture, usability and navigability, whilst retaining overall editorial control over content.

Q. Why are there less text formatting options available?
A. We have dropped some of the formatting options either for accessibility reasons or for consistency with the colour scheme of the templates. We have also introduced some new formatting, such as boxes with coloured and shaded backgrounds.

Q. Some lecturers will have published URLs in leaflets and publicity – will these break after import to the CMS?
A. If you keep the same directory structure in your new site in the CMS, the links will not break. However, we would generally advise people only to publish the domain name of their site, e.g. www.bath.ac.uk/psychology/

Q. Will we have to use Moodle for all information for current students?
A. No, you can still put information for current students on your departmental website, it’s just that current students will no longer appear in the main navigation, as the main focus of departmental sites will be for prospective students, and for promoting your research.

Q. Will the news section be on every page or just the home page?
A. The news section (an RSS feed widget in the right-hand menu) can appear on any page of your site, but it doesn’t have to. News on other pages (e.g. Research) will be filtered to be relevant to the content of that page.

Q. What if I want a feature for my site that is currently not available?
A. We have a team of developers who can build new features into the CMS. These will be prioritised according to how many departments need them, but please submit your feature requests, bug reports and general feedback via our dedicated web form.

If you have any more questions, please post them in the comments.

In the previous post I explained how we chose OpenCms as the University’s content management solution. I will now summarise some of the outcomes of the first OpenCms conference which I recently attended in Köln.

OpenCms is an open source content management system written mainly by a commercial company, Alkacon Software GmbH. Given the attendance at the conference it appears the main users of the system are from mainland Europe and the majority from Germany. A few people attended from further afield, namely USA, India and Japan. Few people use the system in the UK and after discussion with Jonathan Grove (from Futurate, a solution provider based in Sheffield) it appears we are one of the largest organisations using OpenCms in the UK.

Until now there hasn’t been a major community surrounding OpenCms despite the large number of people that have apparently been developing for the system using the built-in module structure. It became apparent at the conference that most were unaware of how much work had been done by people other than the Alkacon developers. This was made clear by the fact that there were about 20 different RSS feed modules that had been developed basically doing the same thing, which became a running joke throughout the proceedings.

At the end of the two days there was already a feeling of community, with many promising to continue discussions and cooperation once they returned home. The conference ended with a discussion panel, consisting of a few delegates and representatives from Alkacon and the other sponsors. The discussions all focused on how the community could be maintained and how it could work together to further development and the success of OpenCms. The core stability of the system was highlighted as a major asset and a bigger benefit than a high number of features, offered by many other CMS systems.

I came away from the conference feeling that from now on we will see a lot more development of the system and also as we are part of this new-born community we can play a big part in its direction.

© Copyright University of Bath. All Rights Reserved.