{"id":3323,"date":"2013-02-27T08:46:07","date_gmt":"2013-02-27T08:46:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/?p=3323"},"modified":"2013-02-27T08:46:07","modified_gmt":"2013-02-27T08:46:07","slug":"sunday-junk-discussion","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2013\/02\/27\/sunday-junk-discussion\/","title":{"rendered":"Sunday 'junk' discussion"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I spend a small part of Sunday morning reading an extended and informed Internet discussion about (so called) Junk DNA and the rival claims made by research groups about the idea of junk, and each other. \u00a0You can find, and follow, it <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/2013\/feb\/24\/scientists-attacked-over-junk-dna-claim\">here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The Observer article begins:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 0px;margin-right: 0px;margin-bottom: 13px;margin-left: 0px;padding: 0px\"><em>It was the scientific surprise of 2012. \u00a0Researchers announced they had found that long stretches of human DNA \u2013 previously dismissed as \"junk\" \u2013 were in fact crucial to the working of our bodies. \u00a0The assumption that our cells are controlled by only a few genes was wrong. \u00a0Scientists on the Encode project \u2013 an international public consortium researching the human genome \u2013 argued that most of our DNA has a part to play. \u00a0But this idea is now the subject of an astonishingly vitriolic attack from other scientists, who say that Encode's \"absurd\" ideas are the work of people who know nothing about evolutionary\u00a0<a title=\"More from guardian.co.uk on Biology\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/science\/biology\">biology<\/a>. \u00a0\"News concerning the death of junk DNA has been greatly exaggerated,\" they insist. \u00a0The row divides scientists over the most fundamental of questions \u2013 is most of our DNA devoid of purpose or does it play a major role in our cells? \u00a0The debate has been triggered by a critique in the\u00a0<span style=\"padding: 0px;margin: 0px\">Genome Biology and Evolution<\/span> journal that is striking for its strident language.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>I'm normally wary of reading the long discussion threads that follow such articles as too frequently they descend into I'll-informed opinion ( ie, prejudice ) and abuse. \u00a0I'd recommend the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk\">Wiltshire Times<\/a> if this is to your taste. \u00a0However, I'm pleased I persevered with the <em>junk<\/em> story as it was not only informative in its own right, it illustrated methodological and practical issues inherent in this sort of research and critique. \u00a0It was also a good example of how the Internet has enabled these rich discussions. \u00a0I wish 'our field' (if that is what it is) had more of them, on <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2013\/02\/26\/shed-share-blues\/\">SHED-SHARE<\/a>, for example.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, of course, although I was slightly better informed, I really wasn't much the wiser. \u00a0Ah well, ... . \u00a0Still time for an alternative career?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I spend a small part of Sunday morning reading an extended and informed Internet discussion about (so called) Junk DNA and the rival claims made by research groups about the idea of junk, and each other. \u00a0You can find, and...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3323","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment","category-news-and-updates"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3323","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3323"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3323\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3323"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3323"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3323"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}