{"id":5317,"date":"2013-12-20T08:36:01","date_gmt":"2013-12-20T08:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/?p=5317"},"modified":"2013-12-20T08:36:01","modified_gmt":"2013-12-20T08:36:01","slug":"reviewing-the-manifesto-launch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2013\/12\/20\/reviewing-the-manifesto-launch\/","title":{"rendered":"Reviewing the Manifesto launch"},"content":{"rendered":"

I wasn't able to be at the launch of the Manifesto<\/a> we all Want<\/em> the other day. \u00a0Had I been there, however, I hope that I might have managed to write the sort of perceptive review that the University of Worcester's Paul Davis and Peng Li produced. \u00a0With their kind permission, here it is in full:<\/p>\n

Briefing Note<\/strong> \u2013 Rio+20 Manifesto Launch<\/strong>, Westminster, London, 17th<\/sup> December 2013.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

The Manifesto Strategy:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong>Opening remarks concerned the long run aspiration for this venture. \u00a0One speaker (JW<\/strong>) identified a need to adopt a \u2018journey-based\u2019 approach that engages and argues with naysayers \u2013 but potential opponents were not really identified or given due regard throughout the meeting. \u00a0IP<\/strong> depicted the Manifesto not as an 'end document' but rather, a prompt for dialogue around sustainable futures.<\/span><\/p>\n

Instead, relatively bold commitments were made by MPs to engage in governmental action \u2013 a domain with which they are more familiar, of course. \u00a0KB<\/strong> criticised the lack of explicit reference to sustainable development in provisions of the Education Act. \u00a0It was noted that national curriculum requirements for sustainable development<\/span> education in schools were present in early years, but that an unexplained break then occurred around Keystage 4, when that requirement lapsed. \u00a0The Shadow Minister undertook to incorporate the sustainable development<\/span> theme more consistently into a revised Act and ensure alignment with sustainable development<\/span> goals through enhanced inter-departmental discipline. \u00a0The emphasis was on cross-cutting action to make sustainable development<\/span> goals an autonomic function of future governmental action. \u00a0KB<\/strong> signalled an intention to review curricular policy on election. \u00a0He observed, based on experience, that policy fragmentation frequently blunts ministerial edict.<\/span><\/p>\n

Throughout the opening addresses, there was recurring use of phrases like 'our home'. \u00a0These themes of sharing and inherent unity underscored the strong appeal to collective interest and natural constituencies that was a mark of the session as a whole. \u00a0This theme recurred. \u00a0AF<\/strong> (SEEd) noted that efforts at environmental education have a long lineage \u2013 but again, the theme is still very partially present in the National Curriculum: it is not embedded, not \u2018made safe\u2019. \u00a0This suggests resistance \u2013 which could be active or (more difficult) passive in nature. \u00a0She posed the question of how to unlock that resistance. \u00a0She appealed, as part of this, to common needs and collective interests of a presumed collective whole, or a movement. \u00a0What one might expect, in this depiction of the future, is a high degree of volatility in stakeholder identities in future sustainable development<\/span> politics. \u00a0This would feature much entryism and potentially, the formation of new alliances.<\/span><\/p>\n

Social Identities and Stakes in Sustainable Development<\/span>:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

The Manifesto talks of the \u2018moral responsibility\u2019 of the education and training sector as a whole to argue the case for sustainable development<\/span>. \u00a0It does not really specify exactly who might be expected to do what in shaping social norms. \u00a0The witness sessions addressed social roles in a \u2018better future\u2019, albeit in conflicting ways. \u00a0In this, young people were depicted as \u2018custodians\u2019, but it is notable that such an appeal to future generations carries no legal status in either English or European law. \u00a0As such, it is easy to talk in such terms, for it is without prejudice.<\/span><\/p>\n

DA<\/strong> (NUS) was resolved that respondents to a succession of NUS surveys wanted to learn more about sustainable development<\/span>. \u00a0He portrayed them as the primary stakeholders in future development. \u00a0This was based on a categorical assertion that a green economy will 'clearly solve our problems'. \u00a0If this were to come to pass, then the conduct of many others (businesses, governments, other citizens) would reflect that status. \u00a0Their conduct would demonstrate the moral<\/em> care associated with normative<\/em> stakeholder practice. \u00a0It evidently does not do so at present.<\/span><\/p>\n

Further to Higher Education interventions, AT<\/strong> wryly noted the legacy of cleverness (with clear shades of arrogance) underpinning the claims of many academics. \u00a0This social positioning did not well fit them to adopt some of the egalitarian stances required of a co-authored future. \u00a0She was persuaded that, given academics\u2019 own consequentialist pressures (Research Excellence; module-specific perspective et cetera), sustainable development<\/span> appeals to them needed to be based on opportunities that were closely aligned with wider academic realities. \u00a0Her work had also identified specific opportunities for both reflection and reflexion, as well as relevant academic networks for the sharing of good practice. \u00a0In the HE academic sphere, normalisation of sustainable development<\/span> should be the goal.<\/span><\/p>\n

MJ<\/strong> emphasised the current reality that sustainable development<\/span> advocates were members of multiple communities and that this was a potential source of strength. \u00a0Heterogeneity was, she opined, crucial to the generation of innovation (by which one presumes that she intended social as well as technical innovation). \u00a0Her b\u00eate noir<\/em> was a syndrome of passive role obedience. \u00a0This theme was also articulated in subsequent discussion by a London Headteacher, in an attack on the undue conformism that he associated with compliance with a hyper-detailed National Curriculum.<\/span><\/p>\n

In many ways most radically, CL<\/strong> called for the complete transformation of existing relations. \u00a0She noted the poverty of measures of well-being based on Gross Domestic Product, echoing longstanding calls for \u00a0\u2018GDP-plus\u2019, Costa Rica indices and French joie de vivre<\/em> valuations. \u00a0What was more significant, she emphasised some of the practices of sharing \u2013 which can be reinterpreted here to emphasise the principles of non-reciprocity (giving without expecting in return) and ideas of the gift economy.<\/span><\/p>\n

Echoing these themes, SE<\/strong> underscored that sustainable development<\/span> would concern a learning process, not just curricular content. \u00a0Having said that, it was clear that sustainability literacy was a goal and Higher Education was seen as playing a central role in achieving that. \u00a0Its meaning does need closer specification, though, since for now it remains an opaque idea. \u00a0In pursuing what is recognisably an Enlightenment aspiration, central diktat can play only a very limited role. \u00a0What will be required is change within<\/em> universities, focusing on alignment between institutions and individuals. \u00a0Here, subsequent discussion of values and their importance across the entire educational system made it clear that these could function as an important alignment tool.<\/span><\/p>\n

A statement \u2018from the floor\u2019 by MD<\/strong> on behalf of the Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative (who are specifically involved in Business School morals) outlined their current approach to this actor. \u00a0A twin track approach was described: inspired and morally rooted practices based on coideation, on the one hand, and (as he termed it) \u2018rod of iron\u2019 accreditation processes, on the other.<\/span><\/p>\n

Key to Speakers:<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n

DA \u2013 Dom Anderson NUS<\/span>
\nKB \u2013 Kevin Brennan MP<\/span>
\nMD \u2013 Mark Dreswell, Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative<\/span>
\nSE \u2013 Steve Egan, HEFCE Interim Chief Executive<\/span>
\nAF \u2013 Ann Finlayson, SEEd<\/span>
\nMJ \u2013 Miranda Jupp, Conservative Futures<\/span>
\nCL \u2013 Caroline Lucas MP<\/span>
\nAT \u2013Ashling Tierney, University of Bristol PhD student<\/span>
\nJW \u2013 Joan Walley MP<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Paul Davis, Peng Li\u00a0\u00a0 18th<\/sup> December 2013<\/span><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I wasn't able to be at the launch of the Manifesto we all Want the other day. \u00a0Had I been there, however, I hope that I might have managed to write the sort of perceptive review that the University of...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2,3,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5317","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment","category-new-publications","category-news-and-updates"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5317","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5317"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5317\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5317"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5317"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5317"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}