{"id":6385,"date":"2015-07-15T13:31:10","date_gmt":"2015-07-15T13:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/?p=6385"},"modified":"2015-07-16T06:26:37","modified_gmt":"2015-07-16T06:26:37","slug":"alternative-pedagogy-in-the-east-end","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2015\/07\/15\/alternative-pedagogy-in-the-east-end\/","title":{"rendered":"Alternative pedagogy in the East End"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I have written a few posts now (see <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2015\/07\/09\/more-lessons-from-far-and-near\/\">this<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2015\/07\/13\/it-may-be-near-n-far-but-what-is-outdoor-learning\/\">this<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2015\/07\/14\/the-best-bit-of-near-n-far\/\">this<\/a>) about Natural England's recent Near and Far <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lotc.org.uk\/2015\/05\/lessons-from-near-and-far-research-and-policy-international-outdoor-learning-conference\/\">conference<\/a>. \u00a0It obviously\u00a0made quite an impression on me \u2013 not wholly positive it has to be said. \u00a0I have been asked,<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><em>\"So, if you're so critical about how NE handled it \u2013 \"poor pedagogy\", \"incarceration\", \"enfettered\", and all \u2013 what would you have done?\"<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As it happened, I was going to write about this, as I thought about it\u00a0on the day; so, here goes: some alternatives for the morning.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><strong>1.<\/strong>\u00a0F<em>ewer presentations, using the saved time to allow us to ask questions of each presenter\u00a0would have been a big improvement. \u00a0It would have broken the structure up and allowed immediate comment and challenge. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>2.<\/strong>\u00a0One good scene-setting in-depth presentation at the start. \u00a0Follow this with small group activity with sharp questions to focus on. \u00a0Follow this with questions from the groups to a well-moderated panel. \u00a0End (perhaps) with some synthesis\u00a0comments from a rapporteur.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>3. <\/strong>Circulate papers from the experts\u00a0a week beforehand (no power points). \u00a0On the day, begin with one good scene-setting in-depth presentation. \u00a0Then introduce\u00a0the experts (one minute each). \u00a0Follow this with a market place: experts spaced out in a room or rooms (with poster displays \/ hand-outs if they wish) and those attending go round to ask the experts the questions they want to ask based on the information they've been given and\u00a0there own ideas. \u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><strong>4.\u00a0<\/strong>Start\u00a0with that\u00a0good scene-setting in-depth presentation. \u00a0Then have a witness session. \u00a0Here, delegates meet in small groups and the experts move between the groups only\u00a0responding to questions. \u00a0The onus here is on the group to organise itse<\/em>lf to gather the information it wants to gain, and\/or the ideas it wants to challenge. \u00a0Come together at the end to share learning.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>There is a progression here with delegates gaining more responsibility and agency as we shift from 1 to 4. \u00a0The depth of organisation needed also increases from 1 to 4, as does the degree to which organisers have to 'let go'. \u00a0This probably explains why nervous conference organisers tend to stick\u00a0with the safety of endless presentations.<\/p>\n<p>Actually, none of this is\u00a0all that alternative; it's just designed to allow participants time to discuss <em>what matters to them<\/em> with the experts, and add their own views. \u00a0Simple really. \u00a0But oh, <em>so<\/em> difficult.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I have written a few posts now (see this, this and this) about Natural England's recent Near and Far conference. \u00a0It obviously\u00a0made quite an impression on me \u2013 not wholly positive it has to be said. \u00a0I have been asked,...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2,5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment","category-talks-and-presentations"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6385\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}