{"id":8094,"date":"2022-04-21T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2022-04-21T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/?p=8094"},"modified":"2022-04-21T07:00:00","modified_gmt":"2022-04-21T07:00:00","slug":"the-dfe-strategy-take-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2022\/04\/21\/the-dfe-strategy-take-1\/","title":{"rendered":"The DfE Strategy : take 1"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here's my first reaction to the newly announced DfE strategy on Sustainability and Climate Change that will be launched later today.<\/p>\n<div class=\"\">It is clear that DfE has been storing up the GCSE natural history to be part of the strategy. \u00a0It\u2019s one of only two new pieces of curriculum. \u00a0The other is a Primary Science Model Curriculum. \u00a0The strategy says:<\/div>\n<blockquote class=\"\">\n<div class=\"\">\"By 2025 we will aim to introduce a natural history GCSE, giving young people a further opportunity to engage with and develop a deeper knowledge and understanding of the natural world. \u00a0In studying this GCSE, young people will explore organisms and environments in more depth, gain knowledge and practical experience of fieldwork and develop a greater understanding of conservation.\"<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"\">The \u00a0document glosses over its optional status, and is silent on whether it can be taken alongside biology as a complement to it; that is to say, to make up for everything that biology isn\u2019t these days.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\n<div>The Primary Science Model Curriculum has re-emerged. \u00a0I came across this as a bland announcement during the pandemic, and then it vanished. \u00a0As I noted a little while ago, these model curricula are a way of changing the national curriculum with going to the bother of formally changing it through parliament. \u00a0Cunning; especially as <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/2022\/03\/03\/the-dfes-new-model-curriculum\/\"><em>model<\/em><\/a>, in this sense, means the best practice that every school should aspire to. \u00a0The strategy says:<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>\" by 2023 we shall develop a Primary Science Model Curriculum, to include an emphasis on nature to ensure all children understand the world around them.\"<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>The emphasis on nature is clearly a positive move. \u00a0You have to wonder whether DfE sees it as a preparation for the natural history GCSE.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\">\n<div class=\"\">Despite these additions, the fact remains that what the national curriculum says, and what existing GCSEs demand, are inadequate because they do not require in-depth study of issues, nor do they enable young people to explore their roles in working with others to create solutions to our problems. \u00a0I suspect that DfE thinks that my last sentence is plain wrong.<\/div>\n<div class=\"\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"\">There's to be an annual climate literacy survey but, as you do not add quality by examination or inspection, it's hard to see this as significant.<\/div>\n<div class=\"\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"\">\u00a0There are a lot of announcements on teacher support and resources but I struggled to see where the coherence is in all of it. \u00a0I badly needed a diagram to make sense of it. \u00a0Climate change and sustainability are to be included in science teachers\u2019 continuing professional development (CPD), but the focus will be on\u00a0scientific facts about climate change and environmental degradation. \u00a0Best practice is to be shared. \u00a0By whom is not clear; not is how \u201cbest\u201d is to be determined. \u00a0I doubt if DfE will do this itself. \u00a0I\u2019ll just note that this is what my local authority science advisor was doing in 1974.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div class=\"\">The nature park idea has a more substance to it than previously, and it\u2019s good to see that the Climate Leaders Award (which\u00a0will complement classroom learning) \"will provide a structured route through existing awards in this area, such as the John Muir Award, Duke of Edinburgh\u2019s Award, Junior Forester Award, and others.\" \u00a0However, given that it goes on to say that \"Participation will enable children and young people to acquire credits towards the prestigious Climate Leaders Award, which will be designed to be recognised and valued in supporting progression to employment and further study\u201d I was left puzzled. \u00a0Can you do a DoE module and get credit for the CLA? \u00a0Or can you do a CLA module and get credit for the DoE? \u00a0Or is it both?<\/div>\n<div class=\"\">\n<div class=\"\">\n<div><\/div>\n<div>There are some promises about ITT but nothing that is clear.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>I read\u00a0that Reading's <em>Climate Education Action Plan Group<\/em> will be setting\u00a0up an independent expert body, including members such as the Royal Meteorological Society, STEM Learning, Association of Science Teaching \u00a0(I think they mean the ASE) for the validation and creation of climate education resources that support the delivery of the national curriculum. \u00a0The emphasis will be on\u00a0facts. \u00a0I could hear the echo of Thomas Gradgrind's cheers.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>In relation to Green Jobs and skills, although on p. 6 they say that \"<span class=\"\">Green jobs will not be niche. We anticipate that sustainability and climate change will touch every career<\/span><span class=\"\" style=\"font-family: Arial\">\u201d,<\/span>\u00a0in relation to what is taught, they have rejected the idea that <a href=\"https:\/\/naee.org.uk\/naee-evidence-to-the-house-of-commons-environmental-audit-committee-inquiry-into-green-jobs\/\">every job is a green job<\/a>. \u00a0NAEE persuaded the EAC that this made sense in the real world; but not to the DfE which goes on about the \"green sector\" and so on. \u00a0This suggests that they do not understand what they\u2019re trying to do.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<div>This was a quick first reaction. \u00a0There will be more ...<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here's my first reaction to the newly announced DfE strategy on Sustainability and Climate Change that will be launched later today. It is clear that DfE has been storing up the GCSE natural history to be part of the strategy....<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":237,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[2,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-comment","category-news-and-updates"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/237"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/edswahs\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}