{"id":1472,"date":"2020-05-01T10:40:19","date_gmt":"2020-05-01T09:40:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/?p=1472"},"modified":"2020-05-01T10:40:19","modified_gmt":"2020-05-01T09:40:19","slug":"coronavirus-caught-our-food-system-on-the-back-foot-but-lets-not-take-a-backward-step","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/2020\/05\/01\/coronavirus-caught-our-food-system-on-the-back-foot-but-lets-not-take-a-backward-step\/","title":{"rendered":"Coronavirus caught our food system on the back foot, but let\u2019s not take a backward step"},"content":{"rendered":"

Joanna Lewis<\/em><\/a> is the Director of Policy and Strategy at the Soil Association.<\/em><\/p>\n

COVID-19 has shaken our complacency about where our food comes from to the core. Supermarket shelves may have refilled for now, but empty baskets in fresh produce aisles remain a real prospect. We are starting to count the cost of our reliance on Spain and the Netherlands \u2013 who, like us, are suffering shortages of fruit and veg pickers - for so much of the fresh food we eat as a nation.<\/p>\n

But does that mean food security should dominate our post-Brexit UK farming policy? Should the UK\u2019s Agriculture Bill<\/a>, with its focus on paying farmers to protect the environment, be torn up and replaced with a shiny new Food Security Bill?<\/p>\n

Let\u2019s not throw the baby out with the bathwater. The climate and ecological emergencies that framed the thinking behind the UK\u2019s new Agriculture Bill have not gone away. Now is not the time to throw away the precious consensus, led by farming bodies as much as by environmental groups, that UK farming can and must play a full role in being part of the climate change solution, rather than the problem.<\/p>\n

If we abandon that consensus and fail to act on reversing damage to climate and nature, we are storing up further shocks for our food system.<\/p>\n

What matters for food security?<\/strong><\/p>\n

We must not fail to learn the lessons of COVID-19 for food security and resilience. But that does not mean a return to paying farmers just to be farmers, or to over-produce commodity crops like maize, which are often destined to be fed to animals or burned for power as biofuels. Too often these crops are grown intensively, causing damage to soils, climate and nature through heavy reliance on fertilisers and pesticides. And they do not contribute to healthy diets. We do not need more of this type of farming for our food security.<\/p>\n

The questions we need to ask are: is UK farming diverse enough to feed its people a healthy diet in times of crisis? How do we build on the great examples of more resilient local and direct food networks springing up everywhere and help them persist beyond the crisis? Is our food system undermining food security by making crises \u2013 from pandemics<\/a> to droughts to pollinator extinctions - more likely? This pandemic has proved that disregarding humanity\u2019s relationship with nature and the welfare of animals we eat can have dire consequences. Food production that doesn\u2019t safeguard the natural world is not secure.<\/p>\n

Top of the resilience \u2018to do list\u2019 should be a clear UK Government ambition to at least double UK fruit supply - and grow the UK share of nuts, pulses<\/a> and vegetables as recommended by the RSA Food, Farming and Countryside Commission<\/a>. We only grew 17% of fruit and 53% of veg<\/a> we ate in 2018 so bold action is needed to grow more UK horticulture, alongside boosting demand via seasonal menus in schools and hospitals<\/a>. \u00a0Coronavirus has revealed the skills gap for horticulture across the UK, with shortages of pickers still facing many farms despite specially chartered flights from Romania. Our research<\/a> has shown how the sector and government need to come together to improve conditions and perceptions of horticultural careers for British workers.<\/p>\n

The ticking timebomb of antibiotic resistance<\/a> \u2013 which threatens to take the NHS back 200 years and make minor operations life-threatening - should also be a focus for UK government leadership globally. Through the Alliance to Save Our Antibiotics<\/a>, the Soil Association campaigns for the phase-out of intensive livestock systems that require preventative antibiotic use and their replacement with high welfare systems like organic that can keep animals in good health.<\/p>\n

Agroecology works for climate, nature, health and resilience<\/strong><\/p>\n

The Agriculture Bill should not be torn up. Instead, it should be amended to set clear goals for healthy food security and resilient supply chains at the same time<\/em> as transitioning UK farming to net zero, nature-friendly systems.<\/p>\n

\u2018Public money for public goods\u2019 - paying farmers to look after the environment, water and air quality - should remain the fundamental principle of the Agriculture Bill. But this needs to be achieved across the whole farm in tandem with healthy, diversified food production. Growing wildflowers around an intensively sprayed monoculture will not be enough to restore nature on the scale we need. Nor will sparing one field for woodland and building an intensive poultry unit on another. Government should support farmers to care for the whole environment, not just part of it.<\/p>\n

The Soil Association is calling for a farmer-led ten-year transition to agroecology to balance the priorities of climate, nature and healthy food production. The French think tank IDDRI\u2019s Ten Years for Agroecology in Europe model<\/a> shows that healthy food security and an effective response to the climate and nature emergencies can indeed go hand-in-hand. The Food, Farming and Countryside Commission and IDDRI will publish an agroecology transition model for the UK later this year.<\/p>\n

The UK has a unique opportunity for leadership if it supports farmers to make this transition. While France has officially made agroecology the cornerstone of its agricultural policy<\/a>, it will take reform of Europe\u2019s Common Agricultural Policy<\/a> to achieve this at scale in practice. Europe\u2019s policymakers are watching the progress of the UK\u2019s Agriculture Bill and Environmental Land Management Scheme with keen interest. There is too much at stake for climate, nature, health and resilience to throw this opportunity away.<\/p>\n

Farmers are the environmental leaders we need<\/strong><\/p>\n

The environmental leadership that UK farming leaders have shown in recent years, and the strong solidarity shown by environmental groups with UK farmers around trade deal risks, means that it is no longer appropriate to pit farmers against environmentalists in these debates.<\/p>\n

Farmers, environmentalists and public health leaders can only achieve their shared goals together. United, we can steer the UK farming transition we so urgently need towards resilient, diverse, healthy food production for climate, nature and health.<\/p>\n

Are you a decision-maker in government, industry or the third sector responding to the coronavirus crisis?\u00a0Apply now<\/a>\u00a0to our virtual Policy Fellowship Programme for access to University of Bath research and expertise.\u00a0Learn more<\/a>.\u00a0<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n

All articles posted on this blog give the views of the author(s), and not the position of the IPR, nor of the University of Bath.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Joanna Lewis is the Director of Policy and Strategy at the Soil Association. COVID-19 has shaken our complacency about where our food comes from to the core. Supermarket shelves may have refilled for now, but empty baskets in fresh produce...<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1186,"featured_media":1473,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[107,137,114,117],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brexit","category-covid-19","category-energy-and-environmental-policy","category-food-and-agriculture"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/115\/2020\/05\/shutterstock_1541893832.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1186"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.bath.ac.uk\/iprblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}