July 2018
-
Is peer review in need of peer review?
Writing about EER's triumphs the other day, reminded me that I've been getting a few emails recently from journals I've never heard of inviting me to join the Board. This is typical: Dear William Scott, I hope this email finds...
-
A different sort of vital statistics
The launch of the UKSSD report, Measuring Up, was ignored by all of the news outlets I pay to read. Even the Guardian (which I don't pay for because I can't read it anymore) didn't mention it, but I came across...
-
PISA gets a good kicking
A recent TES carried an article about PISA written by some of my colleagues at Bath. "meaningless at best; destructive at worst" they said. It begins like this: “Pisa does not presume to tell countries what they should do. Pisa’s...
-
Pruitt's Progress
No one will miss him unless his successor turns out to be even worse which is entirely possible given the nature of US politics. I refer to the egregious Scott Pruitt (no relation) now resigned as head of the EPA brought...
-
How are we Measuring Up?
I missed the launch of Measuring Up – UKSSD's report into how well the UK is implementing the sustainable development goals. There's more detail here, and I hope that government will see the report as useful in helping in what it is doing...
-
EER breaks the 2.594 barrier
The 2017 Journal Citation Reports & Impact Factors have just been released by Clarivate, and it's reported that the Impact Factor of Environmental Education Research has increased from 1.709 to 2.595 – don't you just love the precision. This means that...
-
Curriculum French style
I see that the firm hand of the State has decreed that all French 10 year olds will sing the anthem in public. All of it, I wonder: Arise, children of the Fatherland, The day of glory has arrived! Against us, tyranny's Bloody standard is...
-
Sheep 0 – 1 Friends of rank grasses
I see that James Rebanks [note 1] has been hounded [note 2], by the Friends of Rank Grasses [FRG] masquerading as conservationists, off a Govian panel reviewing the future of the national parks. The Times said: "Mr Rebanks said that...